Nimble
72/ 100
CScore Breakdown72%
Lost points on 5 checks
- cost3/10
- time3/15
- efficiency0/10
- zero errors0/5
- Context70/14
Eval Score (70% weight)66%
cost$0.21 ($0.20–$0.40, good)+3
time209s (180s–300s, slow)+3
efficiency28 tool calls (>25, inefficient)+0
found docsTouched docs at docs.nimbleway.com: yes (15 matching tool calls)+10
zero errorsTool outputs with errors/tracebacks: 2+0
syntax validCode compiles/parses correctly+5
created filesGenerated files: 1 (need ≥1)+10
full executionMethod: full_execution, Exit: 0+35
Final Score
A: >=90%B: 75-89%C: 55-74%D: <55%
(66 × 0.7) + (86 × 0.3)= 72%
Replay
Using https://docs.nimbleway.com, complete the following task: Using Nimble, build me a script that runs a small web research workflow: 1. Run TWO related searches: a. A broad query: "grid-scale battery storage advances" b. A more specific, recency-focused query: "grid-scale battery storage breakthroughs 2025" 2. Merge the results from both searches, deduplicate by URL, and select the top 5 most relevant results 3. If Nimble supports fetching/extracting page content, retrieve the full content of the single most relevant result and write a 2-3 sentence summary grounded in that fetched content (not just the snippet) 4. Print the output as JSON with two keys: - "results": the top 5 deduplicated results, each with title, url, and snippet (or description) - "summary": your grounded 2-3 sentence summary of the top result (include the source url)
battery_research.py
Unlock analytics
See Nimble's score trend, layer rankings, and competitive position.
Run completed Oct 26, 2026, 6:34 PM