Exa

Exa

exa.aiSearchPiPi
79/ 100
B
Score Breakdown79%

Lost points on 4 checks

  • time5/15
  • efficiency2/10
  • zero errors0/5
  • CLI0/14
Eval Score (70% weight)77%
cost$0.00 (<$0.05, excellent)+10
time83s (60s–90s, good)+5
efficiency17 tool calls (≤20, acceptable)+2
found docsTouched docs at docs.exa.ai: yes (2 matching tool calls)+10
zero errorsTool outputs with errors/tracebacks: 2+0
syntax validCode compiles/parses correctly+5
created filesGenerated files: 1 (need ≥1)+10
full executionMethod: full_execution, Exit: 0+35
Checklist Score (30% weight)86%
Context7
Link+14
llms.txt
Link+14
MCP Server
Link+14
Typed SDK
Link+14
OpenAPI
Link+14
Agent Skills
Link+14
CLI
+0

Checklist determined by AI. If something looks wrong, .

Final Score
A: >=90%B: 75-89%C: 55-74%D: <55%
(77 × 0.7) + (86 × 0.3)= 79%
Replay
Using https://docs.exa.ai, complete the following task:

Using Exa, build me a script that runs a small web research workflow:

1. Run TWO related searches:
   a. A broad query: "grid-scale battery storage advances"
   b. A more specific, recency-focused query: "grid-scale battery storage breakthroughs 2025"
2. Merge the results from both searches, deduplicate by URL, and select the top 5 most relevant results
3. If Exa supports fetching/extracting page content, retrieve the full content of the single most relevant result and write a 2-3 sentence summary grounded in that fetched content (not just the snippet)
4. Print the output as JSON with two keys:
   - "results": the top 5 deduplicated results, each with title, url, and snippet (or description)
   - "summary": your grounded 2-3 sentence summary of the top result (include the source url)
exa_research.py

Unlock analytics

See Exa's score trend, layer rankings, and competitive position.

Run completed Oct 20, 2026, 8:06 PM